Comments on: Versionitis https://lizards.opensuse.org/2011/04/06/versionitis/ Blogs and Ramblings of the openSUSE Members Fri, 06 Mar 2020 17:50:09 +0000 hourly 1 By: Florian https://lizards.opensuse.org/2011/04/06/versionitis/#comment-5506 Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:32:45 +0000 http://lizards.opensuse.org/?p=7097#comment-5506 Disregard above post. I messed something up there (8 month cycles actually not 4 months), therefore not appropriate.

]]>
By: Florian https://lizards.opensuse.org/2011/04/06/versionitis/#comment-5505 Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:29:22 +0000 http://lizards.opensuse.org/?p=7097#comment-5505 Sorry. But in my opinion this numbering scheme is stupid. It *COULD* still be cool though if you REALLY did the hybrid “versioning” of year.version combinations. This could easily be realized by using 12.1 for the March Release in 2012, so one more 11 version ahead.
In that way the leading number would incidentally also represent the year of the release and the second number would represent the number of the release of that year. Therefore…

12.1 – March 2012
12.2 – July 2012
12.3 – Novermber 2010
13.1 – March 2013
… and so on.

What do you think? Would make sense I would say.

]]>
By: Maxim https://lizards.opensuse.org/2011/04/06/versionitis/#comment-5238 Mon, 11 Apr 2011 04:43:17 +0000 http://lizards.opensuse.org/?p=7097#comment-5238 He-he-he… Cool!

]]>
By: Ran https://lizards.opensuse.org/2011/04/06/versionitis/#comment-5237 Sun, 10 Apr 2011 23:28:17 +0000 http://lizards.opensuse.org/?p=7097#comment-5237 What about releasing 12.1 on 11th of November, 2011 ; preferably at 11:11 ;-).

]]>
By: hawake https://lizards.opensuse.org/2011/04/06/versionitis/#comment-5227 Sat, 09 Apr 2011 19:28:35 +0000 http://lizards.opensuse.org/?p=7097#comment-5227 (autoreply) ops, i mean why not continue versioning as it was until now?

]]>
By: hawake https://lizards.opensuse.org/2011/04/06/versionitis/#comment-5226 Sat, 09 Apr 2011 19:16:44 +0000 http://lizards.opensuse.org/?p=7097#comment-5226 Hi,
just for curiosity, why the next version will be 12.1 instead of 12.0 ?

Best Regards
hawake

]]>
By: Alkis https://lizards.opensuse.org/2011/04/06/versionitis/#comment-5218 Fri, 08 Apr 2011 21:37:28 +0000 http://lizards.opensuse.org/?p=7097#comment-5218 Well, that was a lesson learned for all of us who do not vote in OpenSUSE polls…

]]>
By: Sven Rogatschew https://lizards.opensuse.org/2011/04/06/versionitis/#comment-5213 Fri, 08 Apr 2011 09:25:48 +0000 http://lizards.opensuse.org/?p=7097#comment-5213 How about KISS? Keep it save and Simple…

Regards

Sven

]]>
By: mathw https://lizards.opensuse.org/2011/04/06/versionitis/#comment-5199 Wed, 06 Apr 2011 10:37:54 +0000 http://lizards.opensuse.org/?p=7097#comment-5199 I must say I’m surprised. People are probably used to weird version number systems by now (they seem to be able to handle Ubuntu’s after all), but this one’s not connected to anything at all! Well, other than to history anyway. I really thought either year.number or a single number would win out.

Still, I didn’t get to vote in the final poll, and whatever the version number is I’m sure OpenSUSE will still be awesome.

]]>