Here is the YaST team again with a new report from the trenches, this time with a small delay over the usual two weeks. Most of the team keeps focused on the development of the upcoming SUSE Linux Enterprise 15 products family, including openSUSE Leap 15. That means finishing and polishing the new storage stack, implementing the new rich ecosystem of products, modules, extensions and roles (one of the biggest highlights of the SLE15 family) and much more. So let’s dive into the most interesting bits coming out of the sprint.
Hostname configuration during installation
And let’s start with one of those stories that illustrate the complexity hidden below the user-oriented YaST surface. During installation is very common to assign a hostname to the machine being installed to identify it clearly and unequivocally in the future.
Usually it is a fixed hostname (stored in
/etc/hostname) but in some circumstances is preferable to set it dynamically by DHCP. Since some time ago (as you read in a previous report and is shown in the image below) YaST allows to set the hostname selecting a concrete interface or with a system-wide variable named
DHCLIENT_SET_HOSTNAME which is defined in
/etc/sysconfig/network/dhcp. The value to be set for such variable during installation can be optionally read from the distribution control file. Last but not least, as you already know, Linuxrc can also be used to enforce a particular network configuration.
Most users have a simple setup that works flawlessly, but we recently got a bug report about a wrong network configuration after installing the system if the hostname configuration was set via Linuxrc. After some research we found that the value of
DHCLIENT_SET_HOSTNAME coming from the control file was overwriting the Linuxrc configuration at the end of the installation. Now it’s fixed and the global variable will be set by the linuxrc sethostname option if provided or loaded from the control file if not. And all that happens now at the very beginning of the installation to give the user to chance to modify it and to ensure the user’s choice is respected at the end.
Take into account that with multiple DHCP interfaces the resulting value for
DHCLIENT_SET_HOSTNAME is not fully predictable. Hence, in that scenario we recommend to explicitly select the interface which is expected/allowed to modify the hostname.
Extending the installation process via RPM packages
As we have mentioned (a couple of times) during latest reports, we are implementing multi-product support for the installer. It means that SUSE will ship several products on a single installation media.
One interesting feature is that products, modules and extensions can define its own installation roles. For instance, if you select the desktop extension, you will be able to select GNOME as system role.
During this sprint, we have improved roles definitions handling, displaying a different list of roles depending on which product was selected.
As a side effect, we added support for sorting roles assigning them a display order.
Getting Release Notes from the Installation Repository
As part of our effort to drop SUSE tags from the installation media, we improved the way in which release notes are handled during installation.
Release notes are downloaded from openSUSE or SUSE websites in order to show always the latest version. Of course, the installation media includes a copy of them, which may be outdated, to be used when there is no network connection.
From now on, instead using some additional files, this offline copy of release notes will be retrieved from the release-notes package which lives in the packages repository. So we do not need to ship additional files containing release notes in the installation media anymore.
Moreover, although the old approach worked just fine in almost all cases, there was an uncovered scenario. Let’s consider a system which have access to an updated packages repository but is not connected to Internet. That could be the case, for instance, if you are using SUSE Subscription Management Tool (SMT). With the new approach, the installer will get release notes from that repository instead of displaying the (potentially outdated) ones included in the installation media.
Additionally, we refactored and clean-up a lot of old code, improving also test coverage.
Storage reimplementation: bringing more features back
We are also working hard to make sure the brand new
yast2-storage-ng includes all the features from
yast2-storage, in addition to the new ones. That means that, after this 44th sprint, SLE15 is already able to perform the following operations using the new module.
- Creating MD software RAID devices in the expert partitioner. This feature is specially relevant for many openQA tests that rely on it.
- Displaying the compact description of the partitioning proposal in the one-click-installer screen used by SUSE CaaSP and openSUSE Kubic
- Importing users and SSH system keys from a previous (open)SUSE installation.
Rethinking LVM thin provisioning
When trying to create a thin-pool using all free space the metadata has to be accounted for. In contrast to linear LVs the metadata for thin-pool uses space of the VG. For instance, if there are 2048 GiB free in the VG, the metadata for a maximal size thin-pool is about 128 MiB and the pool can be about 2047.9 GiB big.
Additionally LVM creates a spare metadata with the same size. This spare metadata is shared between all pools and thus has the size of the biggest pool metadata. The spare metadata can be deleted manually and all pool metadata can also be resized.
When starting with an empty VG it is relative easy to account for the metadata. But how to handle this with an already existing volume group? Also take into account a volume group containing e.g. RAID LVs or cache pools (which also have metadata).
We finally decided that, during probing, YaST will check how much free space the VG has and then it will calculate “reserved” value for the volume group:
reserved = total size - used by LVs the library handles - free
So when calculating available space for a normal or thin pool, it will take the “reserved” into account:
max size = total size - reserved - used by LVs the library handles
The only drawback is that the maximal size for the pool can be smaller than actually possible since e.g. the spare metadata might be shared with an already existing thin pool.
More to come
The 45th sprint has already started and you can expect more and more work in the installer for SLE15 and openSUSE Leap 15 and more news regarding the revamped storage stack. Meanwhile, don’t forget to have a lot of fun!
Both comments and pings are currently closed.